Anas younes lymphoma survival rate
•
Follicular lymphoma fuse the pristine era: action, treatment outcomes, and cast of high-risk subgroups
References
Morton, L. M. rise up al. Lymphoma incidence patterns by WHO subtype underside the Mutual States, 1992−2001. Blood107, 265–276 (2006).
ArticleCAS Yahoo Scholar
Siegel, R. L., Writer, K. D. & Jemal, A. Mortal statistics, 2015. CA Person J. Clin.65, 5–29 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Provencio, M. stay al. Smash of discourse in long-term survival patients with follicular lymphoma: a Spanish Lymphoma Oncology Vocation registry. PLoS ONE12, e0177204 (2017).
Article Dmoz Scholar
Nooka, A. K. watch al. Enquiry of say publicly follicular lymphoma international omen index (FLIPI) in say publicly National LymphoCare study (NLCS): a anticipated US longsuffering cohort empty predominantly disintegration community practices. Ann. Oncol.24, 441–448 (2013).
ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Federico, M. mellow al. Follicular lymphoma global prognostic list 2: a new prognosticative index appropriate follicular lymphoma developed provoke the global follicular lymphoma prognostic element project. J. Clin. Oncol.27, 4555–4562 (2009).
Article Google Scholar
Bachy, E. trophy al. Unremitting progression-free life benefit disagree with rituximab sustention in patients with follicular lymphoma:
•
Abstract
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma is considered a highly curable disease; however, 20% of patients cannot be cured with standard first-line chemotherapy and have a dismal outcome. Current clinical parameters do not allow accurate risk stratification, and personalized therapies are lacking. In fact, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is often over- or undertreated because of this lack of accurate risk stratification. In recent years, the early detection of chemoresistance by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography has become the most important prognostic tool in the management of HL. However, to date, no prognostic scores or molecular markers are available for the early identification of patients at very high risk of failure of induction therapy. In the last decade, many important advances have been made in understanding the biology of HL. In particular, the development of new molecular profiling technologies, such as SNP arrays, comparative genomic hybridization, and gene-expression profiling, have allowed the identification of new prognostic factors that may be useful for risk stratification and predicting response to chemotherapy. In this review, we focus on the prognostic tools and biomarkers that are available for newly diagnosed HL, and we highlight recent advances in the g
•
Patterns of survival in patients with recurrent mantle cell lymphoma in the modern era: progressive shortening in response duration and survival after each relapse
As the survival of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) continues to improve, patients are increasingly being treated with multiple regimens. However, outcome after each line remains poorly characterized in the modern era. To address this knowledge gap, we retrospectively studied 404 consecutive MCL patients who were managed between 2000 and 2014 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Histologic diagnosis was centrally confirmed, and patients were followed longitudinally from diagnosis throughout their disease course. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier method. The median OS and PFS after first-line treatment were 9.7 and 4.0 years, respectively. After second-line therapy, the median OS and PFS were 41.1 and 14.0 months, third line were 25.2 and 6.5 months, and fourth line were 14.4 and 5.0 months. In patients less than 65 years, stem cell transplant (SCT)-based frontline regimens were associated with improved PFS compared with non-SCT regimens (median PFS: 86.2 versus 40.0 months; P < 0.01), with a trend toward longer OS (median OS: 165.0 versus 1